作者：文文徒来源：原创时间：2026-08-26 阅读：4353 次

焦糖

中韩游戏大爆料，海外却吵疯！新作大同小异？MMO成重灾区_我的网站

游戏人生

A | New Delhi, Oct 20 (UNI) Supreme Court declined to lift the ban on firecrackers and refused to hear the petition filed by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader, Manoj Tiwari challenging the blanket ban on firecrackers in Delhi, after noting that let people breathe clean air and spend your money on sweets instead.

"Let the people breathe clean air, and spend your money on sweets instead," the Supreme Court's bench, headed by Justice M R Shah said, in his order and refused to lift the ban on firecrackers.

Lawyer Shashank Shekhar Jha, advocate appearing for Tiwari, had pleaded to the Supreme Court for lifting ban on firecrackers. He urged the Top that the Delhi government's order on blanket ban on firecrackers is a complete violation. So thereby this Court should pass appropriate order and direction in lifting the ban on firecrackers.

Jha also submitted to the Apex Court that this court had earlier allowed crackers without Barium Salt and green crackers. So this time also, this court should allow sort of similar directions and orders.

Jha also submitted to the Apex Court that the pollution is rising due to Parali (stubble burning) burning and other factors, but Justice Shah refused to hear it on urgent basis and said the Court would hear the petition later.

The BJP leader, Tiwari, had moved the Supreme Court challenging the blanket van order of the Delhi Government on firecrackers in Delhi. But after keeping in view the fact that the pollution level is not in levels, so declined to lift the ban on firecrackers.

Tiwari sought directions to the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government to issue fresh guidelines with regard to sale, purchase and bursting of permissible firecrackers during the upcoming festive season.

The BJP MP also sought directions to all States not to take any coercive action like lodging FIR against common people found selling or using permissible firecrackers.

"In the name of Right to life, freedom of religion cannot be taken away and that a balance has to be struck like that has been done through the decision of this Court dated October 29, 2021," submitted the plea filed through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey and Shashank Shekhar Jha.

In 2021, the Supreme Court had clarified there is no blanket ban on use of firecrackers and only those fireworks which contain barium salts are prohibited.

The Top Court had banned the usage of firecrackers which are found to be injurious to health while making it clear that there was no blanket ban on crackers and that people can include permissible firecrackers to celebrate their festival, the plea said.

The AAP government in Delhi on September 7 put a blanket ban on firecrackers with immediate effect in the capital till January 1, 2023.

UNI BAV SY GNK。近日，2026科隆游戏展开幕夜直播落下帷幕。

B | 本届展会有60家中国游戏厂商参与，参展规模刷新历史记录。开幕夜直播环节，米哈游新作《源初之结》作为第一个登场的作品对外亮相。后续的展示环节，还有不少来自中韩两地的游戏项目接连放出物料，《LikeorDie》《永恒之塔2》《无限大》《湮灭之潮》等作品都出现在展会上。大量中韩游戏集中曝光之后，网络上出现一种讨论声音，不少观众觉得，这批游戏观感趋于接近。知名行业分析师诸葛（DanielAhmad/ZhugeEX）也在社交平台针对该说法发表自己的看法。诸葛提到，大型国际展会放出的演示内容，大多来自拥有3A预算的开发项目。这一类作品，在画面表现、玩法框架层面容易出现趋同的表现。但中韩两地的游戏产出，并不只有这类高成本大作。他还列举不少中韩团队打造的作品，这些作品覆盖独立游戏、创意小品到中等规模制作，各自拥有很鲜明的风格。社区内部也衍生出更多角度的讨论。部分玩家表示，这种近似的观感，来自大家把目光集中在3A大作区间，忽略独立与中型项目带来的内容差异。也有玩家提出，同类问题并不只发生在中韩游戏身上，欧美大厂的3A作品，同样会出现风格趋同的情况。

C | 还有观点认为，近几年中国厂商在国际大型展会的曝光频次变高，大量新作集中对外展示，更多元的作品库，还需要更长时间，才能被普通玩家完整看到。
展会只挑选头部项目进行对外展示，天然会筛选掉大量风格迥异的中小体量作品，这也在一定程度上，放大了玩家“作品看起来差不多”的主观感受。完整的地区游戏生态，需要把大中小不同规模的作品全部纳入观察范围，才能做出相对客观的判断。你觉得中韩游戏是否存在观感趋同的现象？你玩过哪些风格特质明显、打破固有印象的中韩游戏？欢迎在评论区留下你的看法～。